Asbestos challenge for Costello

By Lindsay Gale14 February 2012

For the second time in three years, Costello Dismantling was awarded the Environmental/Recycling Award at our 2011 World Demolition Awards, this time for a challenging asbestos remediation and demolition contract. D&Ri reports.

To make way for athletic fields and grounds adjacent to the new US$200 million (€155 million) Newton North High School, Costello Dismantling began demolition of the former NNHS in June 2010.

A fairly routine, albeit difficult, demolition component was coupled with a massive environmental remediation scope of work to create an extremely challenging overall project.

This challenge was compounded by a sensitive community relations element and discoveries made during the course of demolition that required a unique and inventive engineering solution.

Built in 1974 when the conventional construction technique was structural steel framework, poured in place floor slabs, masonry block interior partition walls and masonry block and brick exterior walls, NNHS is located on a square block parcel in a densely-populated residential suburb of Boston,

Massachusetts. The site is surrounded on three sides by residential neighbourhoods and to the rear by the new high school and athletic fields. The entire community was very active and concerned with all aspects of the project.

A public meeting was held on the first Tuesday of each month to address fears and concerns that the neighbourhood had about asbestos, noise, dust, vibration, traffic control, parking and disruption of their daily life throughout the duration of the project. These important meetings mitigated community concerns.

Fireproofing issues

All the interior block walls had been identified as being asbestos-contaminated from overspray of fireproofing applied to the structural steel during construction that had permeated the inner cavities of the masonry block walls.

The spray-on fireproofing had also settled on top of ceiling tiles throughout a large portion of the building, obviously necessitating careful abatement.

In addition, a large percentage of the flooring and/or flooring mastic in the classroom areas contained asbestos. Window caulking and roofing mastics also tested positive for asbestos.

The extraordinary volume and extent of asbestos materials was a daunting challenge to address in the bidding and development phases of the project.

To meet an accelerated overall project schedule, the building was carefully divided into eight work zones, allowing multiple environmental sub-contractors and Costello's demolition crews to work simultaneously.

The site required the packaging of all asbestos debris in double-lined, labelled and sealed gaylord 0.9 x 0.9 x0.9 m (3 x 3 x 3 ft) heavy cardboard boxes.

The loaded boxes were taken from containment zones into decontamination chambers, then by forklift to load-out areas.To insure optimum shipping weights, each box was weighed, manifested and loaded into 16.2 m (53 ft) box trailers for shipping.

During the course of the project, more than 650 trailer loads were shipped in this manner.

Prior to structural demolition of Zone 1, Costello performed preliminary inspections of the exterior walls to fully understand the remaining structure.

The pre-bid asbestos survey and as-built structural drawings from the original construction, upon which the bid had relied on, did not indicate fireproofing in the exterior wall areas.

It was quickly discovered that the same asbestos fireproofing overspray was present in the interstitial space of the masonry block as well as through-wall asbestos containing flashing at each floor level of the school.

Asbestos, asbestos everywhere

Further testing quickly revealed that asbestos was pervasive in almost all of the exterior walls. Removing the exterior walls now as asbestos-containing material dramatically changed the demolition methodology.

Full containment, negative air on the work zones during abatement, packaging and loading out asbestos debris in cardboard boxes and loading box trailers was now required.

Winter was quickly approaching and the early spring scheduled completion of work was now out of the question.

The task at hand became to engineer a system that could safely and cost-effectively allow this excess material to be handled while affecting the schedule as little as possible.

The first approach that Costello looked at was to erect scaffolding around the entire 4-storey building and shrink-wrap the building envelope to allow removal of the exterior walls within negative air containment. Wrapping the building had been the only successfully-executed practice that had been previously approved in Massachusetts for similar circumstances.

The price for the change order work came in at more than US$5 million (€3.9 million).

This was beyond the budget, contingency and rainy day fund authority, and the city would have to consider finishing all interior abatement, then securing the school building until funding could be realised in subsequent years.

The new athletic fields to be built on the footprint of the old school would have to be postponed, which was a very disagreeable but real possibility.

Costello immediately began to think outside the box to come up with a different solution.

The first seed of an idea came with the thought of somehow maintaining the exterior brick course in place to provide containment without a complete building wrap while removing the concrete block from the inside.

The problem would be that the brick course was incapable of supporting itself with the masonry courses and steel ties removed.

Supporting act

Costello's structural engineer, project manager and entire staff spent countless hours poring over the problem.

The solution evolved and was refined many times into a system of exterior supports that braced the brick façade against the interior floors.

The supports would be installed before interior masonry block removal, then removed and reinstalled as each floor of a zone was abated.

This also allowed the brick façade to be recycled rather than disposed of as asbestos-containing debris, a saving of at least 25% of disposal costs.

Weeks of engineering - taking into account support loads, wind loads and the myriad of forces at play - produced design documents and calculations that were submitted for peer review and finally this extremely unorthodox approach was delivered to the regulatory bodies.

After being granted a trial of the method, MassDEP enthusiastically approved Costello's plan.

After approval of a funding request that shaved US$2 million (€1.5 million) off the original estimate, abatement and subsequent demolition began, with two sub-contractors working from each end of the building towards the middle.

The work proceeded flawlessly. Soon zones were sequentially released for demolition, with demolition teams taking down zones of the building at the north and south ends simultaneously.

A second team prepared and shipped 4,000 tons of structural steel while a third crew removed and processed concrete slabs and foundations, much of which was used for on-site fill requirements.

The discovery of asbestos fireproofing in exterior walls pushed back the start of demolition by four months, but an expertly organised and executed demolition plan released critical areas of the work zone to the developer only one month after the original milestone, a full month ahead of the revised schedule.

Grass was growing on new athletic fields before the start of school in the autumn to put the finishing touches on the City of Newton's new flagship school.

MAGAZINE
NEWSLETTER
Delivered directly to your inbox, Demolition & Recycling International Newsletter features the pick of the breaking news stories, product launches, show reports and more from KHL's world-class editorial team.
Latest News
Global construction industry to grow by 5.7% in 2021
Report predicts construction to see good growth in 2021, although issues such as lack of materials remains a concern
Wacker Neuson breaks ground on logistics centre
New centre brings company’s process chain to a single site, from development to production and delivery 
Top performing construction sectors revealed
Survey by Turner & Townsend reveals top three performing sectors for construction industry
CONNECT WITH THE TEAM
Steve Ducker Editor, Demolition & Recycling International Tel: +44(0) 1892 786 210 E-mail: steve.ducker@khl.com
Bridget Leary Sales Manager Tel: +44 (0) 1892 786 220 E-mail: bridget.leary@khl.com
CONNECT WITH SOCIAL MEDIA